Lenstar Vs Iolmaster. Hill. m.d.. offers clinical experience of lenstar ks compared to iolmaster and manual keratometry. And in 20 eyes (8.6%) with iolmaster 500 possibly related to the severity of lens opacification (the corneas had good transparency in the eyes included in the study).
Operation Imaging LENSTAR Optical Biometer Haag Streit from doctor-hill.com
It was not possible to determine al in 16 eyes (6.9%) with lenstar ls 900; 89% of all eyes had best uncorrected visual acuity within one line of best corrected visual acuity 95% ci − 0.25 to − 0.02 mm;
doctor-hill.com
As can be noted. the eyes where the lenstar measured the eyes longer than iolmaster and are in the negative range. yet the eyes that were measured shorter by. No statistically significant differences were found. except for iolmaster 500 vs lenstar ls 900 (p = 0.02) with an average difference of 0.13 ± 0.23 mm.
eyemd.com
Several studies confirmed lenstar’s repeatability. reproducibility and agreement with other biometry devices. 95% ci − 0.25 to − 0.02 mm;
haag-streit.com
And in 20 eyes (8.6%) with iolmaster 500 possibly related to the severity of lens. Several studies confirmed lenstar’s repeatability. reproducibility and agreement with other biometry devices.
eyecarealliance.com
And in 20 eyes (8.6%) with iolmaster 500 possibly related to the severity of lens opacification (the corneas had good transparency in the eyes included in the study). While the iolmaster uses lateral slit illumination to determine the distance between the corneal epithelium and the anterior surface of the crystalline lens. the lenstar uses olcr technology to detect the corneal thickness from epithelium to endothelium and the distance from the endothelium to the anterior surface of the crystalline lens which represents the anatomic acd.
Source: doctor-hill.com
Nificant difference. except for the comparison of cd measurements using the lenstar and iolmaster (p=0.175). Several studies confirmed lenstar’s repeatability. reproducibility and agreement with other biometry devices.
![[Full text] Comparison of agreement and efficiency of a](https://i2.wp.com/www.dovepress.com/front_end/cr_data/article_fulltext/s182000/182898/img/opth-182898-f02.jpg)
dovepress.com
It was not possible to determine al in 16 eyes (6.9%) with lenstar ls 900; The results may be summarized as follows:
In 19 Eyes (8.2%) With Aladdin;
Cataract penetration is good but not at all possible in all cases. Lenstar and between the iolmaster and the lenstar (p0.001 and p0.0001). And in 20 eyes (8.6%) with iolmaster 500 possibly related to the severity of lens.
Hill. M.d.. Offers Clinical Experience Of Lenstar Ks Compared To Iolmaster And Manual Keratometry.
Figure 3 shows the agreement between the acd values measured with the three biometers (bland and altman plots). 89% of all eyes had best uncorrected visual acuity within one line of best corrected visual acuity Iolmaster 700 users can continue to use the optimized iol constants for more than 270 lenses from the user group laser interface biometry (ulib) database.
While The Iolmaster Uses Lateral Slit Illumination To Determine The Distance Between The Corneal Epithelium And The Anterior Surface Of The Crystalline Lens. The Lenstar Uses Olcr Technology To Detect The Corneal Thickness From Epithelium To Endothelium And The Distance From The Endothelium To The Anterior Surface Of The Crystalline Lens Which Represents The Anatomic Acd.
The reproducibility of the lenstar was excellent. And in 20 eyes (8.6%) with iolmaster 500 possibly related to the severity of lens opacification (the corneas had good transparency in the eyes included in the study). The differences in iol power calculations for an al of 20. 25 and 30 mm with a mean difference between lenstar and iolmaster al measurements of 0.03 mm. were 0.13 d. 0.10 d and 0.08 d. respectively.
It Was Not Possible To Determine Al In 16 Eyes (6.9%) With Lenstar Ls 900;
To the best of our knowledge. this is the first study to compare the iol power predictions based on the measurement provided by lenstar 900 vs the new iolmaster 700. Several studies confirmed lenstar’s repeatability. reproducibility and agreement with other biometry devices. This also takes longer as the lenstar is capturing all of these measurements at once. while the iolmaster takes it’s oct for axial length separately from its slit beam to capture acd.
Nificant Difference. Except For The Comparison Of Cd Measurements Using The Lenstar And Iolmaster (P=0.175).
Axial eye length (the axial length reading displayed by the ls 900 has been balanced with respect to the iolmaster. i.e. The mean time for lenstar from the point of data entry to the completion of the measurement was 198.0 seconds or. In a recent study dr.